I am a Marine on fire for The Lord. I Love your work sir, and I am a huge fan! My question is, Gospel feel like the arguments for saying the gospels where written before 70A. D, is very powerful. D and the other gospels where written after 70 A.
Thank you sir. United States.
Jacob, thank you for your service to our country! May God make you a bright light among your fellow Marines! The arguments for the traditional dating of the Gospels have been aptly compared to a line of drunks reeling arm in arm down the street. Trip up one, and they all collapse.
Since it is generally agreed that Mark was one of the sources used by Matthew and Luke, it follows that if Mark was written around AD 70, then the other Gospels must have been written later. By contrast, if we begin with Luke and Matthew and work backwards, then the date of Mark is pushed back well before AD The evidence that Click was written prior to AD dating e.
#555 Dating the Gospels
Such a dating makes eminently good sense. It is incredible that the early church would have waited for decades before committing the Jesus story on which it was founded to writing. So why do scholars find the evidence for a later date of Mark so compelling? But this argument gospel bear the dating placed on it. His predictions resemble more closely the Old Testament descriptions of the destruction of Jerusalem in BC by the Babylonian army than descriptions of the Roman destruction in AD Again, this makes such good sense.
Dr. craig’s response
As a prophet Jesus would naturally draw upon the Old Testament for his predicted judgement upon Jerusalem. If this argument for a later date of Mark falls, so gospel all the dates dependent upon it. While the historical credibility of the Gospels in nowise depends on this click here dating, still such an early date strengthens all the dating the case for their historical reliability.
Q Hey, Dr. Craig, I am a Marine on fire for The Lord. Thank you sir Jacob United States.